ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Inhaltsvalidität×Diskriminante Validität×
FachgebietPsychometriePsychometrie
FamilieLatent structureLatent structure
Entstehungsjahr19751959
UrheberC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
TypValidity evidence / expert judgement procedureValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Wegweisende QuelleLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Aliasnamencontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Verwandt65
ZusammenfassungContent validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Content Validity · Discriminant Validity. Abgerufen am 2026-06-15 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare