Methoden vergleichen

	Vergleichende klassische Grounded Theory	Klassische Grounded Theory
Fachgebiet	Qualitativ	Qualitativ
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s	1967
Urheber	Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser	Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss
Typ	Qualitative theory-building design	Qualitative research method
Wegweisende Quelle	Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607	Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.
Aliasnamen	Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory	Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GT
Verwandt	6	6
Zusammenfassung	Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions.	Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks.