ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Architekturschmalerkennung×Modelle zur Fehlerprädiktion×
FachgebietSoftwaretechnikSoftwaretechnik
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr20092005
UrheberMartin Fowler and García et al.Thomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Typpattern-based analysismachine learning model
Wegweisende QuelleFowler, M. (2018). Code smell. Martin Fowler's Website. link ↗Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗
Aliasnamendesign smell detection, architectural debt analysis, system quality assessmentfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Verwandt44
ZusammenfassungArchitecture smells are recurring patterns in system structure that indicate potential design problems. Introduced by García et al. (2009), these patterns signal violations of architectural principles (modularity, independence, abstraction) at system scale. Detection combines code metrics, dependency analysis, and pattern recognition to identify smells early, guiding refactoring and architectural improvements.Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Architecture Smell Detection · Defect Prediction Model. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare