Methoden vergleichen

	Schätzung des Einwiederholungsmaximums (1RM)	Kraft-Geschwindigkeits-Profil
Fachgebiet	Sportwissenschaft	Sportwissenschaft
Familie	Hypothesis test	Hypothesis test
Entstehungsjahr	1993	2007
Urheber	Matt Brzycki	Biomechanics Research Group
Typ	submaximal prediction	mechanical profiling
Wegweisende Quelle	Brzycki, M. (1993). Strength testing: predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 64(1), 88-90.	Bampouras, T. M., Comyns, T. M., Daly, D. J., & Deighan, M. A. (2007). Comparison of the Wingate test and an isokinetic anaerobic test in recreationally active children. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(12), 822-825.
Aliasnamen	one-rep max prediction, estimated 1RM, strength prediction, maximal strength assessment	FVP, force-velocity curve, power profile, strength-speed balance
Verwandt	5	5
Zusammenfassung	One-repetition maximum (1RM) estimation is a method to predict an athlete's maximum strength in a given lift without performing an actual maximal single repetition. Developed systematically by Matt Brzycki (1993) and refined by numerous researchers, 1RM estimation uses submaximal loads and repetition performance to extrapolate a strength ceiling. Rather than exposing untrained individuals, older adults, or post-injury athletes to the stress and injury risk of true 1RM testing, estimation provides a safer, time-efficient alternative. Multiple prediction equations exist, with varying accuracy depending on population and lift type.	The force-velocity profile characterizes an individual's mechanical properties across the force-velocity spectrum, revealing whether strength advantage lies in maximal force production or high-velocity power output. Formalized by Samozino and colleagues (2012), the FVP is derived from multiple load-velocity measurements (typically sprint starts, jumps, or push-off movements at various resistances) and mathematically modeled as a linear inverse relationship between force and velocity, anchored by maximal power. Athletes differ markedly in their FVP: some excel at moving heavy loads slowly (force-dominant), while others excel at moving light loads fast (velocity-dominant). Profiling identifies these phenotypes and informs targeted training interventions.