ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineProgram-model fidelity scales

Case Management Fidelity Assessment

Case management fidelity assessment measures how closely a case-management or care-coordination program matches the defined model it claims to implement — such as assertive community treatment, intensive case management, or a strengths model — by rating specific structural and process dimensions on anchored scales and aggregating them into an overall fidelity score. The approach was established by the Dartmouth tradition of Teague, Bond, and Drake, whose Assertive Community Treatment fidelity scale became the template for measuring whether a program is delivering its model in practice or only in name.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Teague, G. B., Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (1998). Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: Development and use of a measure. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(2), 216–232. DOI: 10.1037/h0080331
  2. Bond, G. R., Evans, L., Salyers, M. P., Williams, J., & Kim, H. W. (2000). Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research, 2(2), 75–87. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010153020697

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Fidelity Assessment of Case Management and Care Coordination Models. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/social-work/case-management-fidelity

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateCase Management Fidelity Assessment (Fidelity Assessment of Case Management and Care Coordination Models). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/social-work/case-management-fidelity · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026