Boundary-Work Analysis
Boundary-work analysis studies how the line between science and non-science is drawn, defended, and contested—not by philosophers laying down timeless criteria, but by actors doing rhetorical work to secure authority, resources, and credibility. Introduced by Thomas Gieryn in 1983 and elaborated in his 1999 book Cultural Boundaries of Science, the approach treats demarcation as a practical, strategic, and historically variable accomplishment. The method examines the discourse of demarcation episodes to reveal the strategies—expansion, expulsion, and protection of autonomy—through which the cultural map of science is redrawn whenever its credibility is on the line.
Læs hele metoden
Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.
Metodekort
Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.
Kilder
- Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325 ↗
- Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226292625
Sådan citerer du denne side
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Boundary-Work Analysis (Demarcation of Science). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/science-technology-studies/boundary-work-analysis
Hvilken metode?
Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ sammenlign
- Laboratory EthnographyScience Technology Studies↔ sammenlign
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ sammenlign
- Technological Frames AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ sammenlign
Refereret af
Lignende metoder
Har du fundet en fejl på denne side? Indberet den eller foreslå en rettelse →