ScholarGate
Assistent

High Culture and Mass Culture

The long argument over whether a hierarchy separating great art from popular entertainment is a defence of value or a disguise for class power.

Find emne med PaperMindSnartFind papers & topics
Tools & resources
Hent slides
Learn & explore
VideoSnart

Definition

High culture denotes works held to embody superior aesthetic and intellectual value, typically associated with an educated elite; mass culture denotes the standardised cultural products consumed by large audiences. The high/mass distinction is the evaluative hierarchy that orders the two.

Scope

This topic examines the distinction between high or minority culture and mass or popular culture, from its defence in Arnold and Leavis, through the Frankfurt School's critique of standardised mass culture, to Bourdieu's account of taste as a marker of class. It does not cover the analysis of particular popular forms, which belong to subculture and media topics.

Core questions

  • Does the high/low hierarchy track real differences in value or merely social standing?
  • Is mass culture inherently standardised and passive?
  • How does taste function to mark and reproduce class position?

Key theories

Minority culture and mass civilisation
Arnold and later Leavis defended a minority culture as the custodian of standards against a levelling, commercial mass civilisation.
Taste as distinction
Bourdieu argued that aesthetic preferences are not innate but socially conditioned, functioning to mark class distinction and reproduce inequality.

History

The defence of high culture against a debased mass civilisation runs from Arnold through the Leavisite criticism of the early twentieth century. The Frankfurt School recast the contrast as a critique of the culture industry, while Bourdieu's sociology of taste in the 1970s reframed the hierarchy as a mechanism of class distinction rather than a scale of intrinsic value.

Debates

Defence of standards versus class snobbery
Critics dispute whether the high/mass hierarchy preserves genuine cultural value or merely naturalises the cultural preferences of dominant classes.

Key figures

  • Matthew Arnold
  • F. R. Leavis
  • Theodor Adorno
  • Pierre Bourdieu

Related topics

Seminal works

  • arnold1869
  • leavis1930
  • bourdieu1984

Frequently asked questions

Is the high/low culture distinction still taken seriously?
Most contemporary cultural theory treats the hierarchy as a social construction worth analysing rather than an objective scale, though debates about value persist.

Methods for this concept

Related concepts