ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineIndirect questioning techniques

List Experiment

The list experiment, also called the item count technique, is a survey design that measures the prevalence of a sensitive attitude or behavior without ever requiring any respondent to directly disclose it. Respondents are randomly split into two groups: a control group sees a list of innocuous items and reports only how many apply to them, while a treatment group sees the same list plus one sensitive item. Because respondents report only a count, no individual answer reveals their stance on the sensitive item, and the difference in average counts between the groups estimates the proportion holding the sensitive trait.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Imai, K. (2011). Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Item Count Technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(494), 407–416. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10415
  2. Blair, G., & Imai, K. (2012). Statistical Analysis of List Experiments. Political Analysis, 20(1), 47–77. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpr048
  3. Glynn, A. N. (2013). What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum? Design and Analysis of the List Experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(S1), 159–172. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfs070

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). List Experiment (Item Count Technique). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/list-experiment

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateList Experiment (List Experiment (Item Count Technique)). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/list-experiment · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026