ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineField experimental designs

Audit Experiment

An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00515.x
  2. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002561

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/audit-experiment

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateAudit Experiment (Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study)). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/political-science/audit-experiment · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026