ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineSystemic functional linguistics / discourse semantics

Appraisal Analysis

Appraisal analysis is the systematic study of evaluative language — how speakers and writers express feelings, make judgements, value things, take a stance toward other voices, and turn the volume of their evaluations up or down. Developed by James Martin and Peter White within the interpersonal metafunction of systemic functional linguistics, the appraisal framework codes evaluative meaning along three systems: ATTITUDE (the kinds of feeling expressed), ENGAGEMENT (how the text positions itself among alternative voices and viewpoints), and GRADUATION (how evaluations are intensified or softened, sharpened or blurred). The method makes the often-invisible work of evaluation explicit, showing how texts construe stance and build alignment with their readers.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 9781403904096
  2. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text (pp. 142–175). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198238546

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Appraisal Analysis (Evaluative Language). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/linguistics/appraisal-analysis

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateAppraisal Analysis (Appraisal Analysis (Evaluative Language)). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/linguistics/appraisal-analysis · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026