ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelinePolicy and programme gender analysis

Gender Mainstreaming Assessment

Gender mainstreaming assessment, operationalised most concretely as gender impact assessment (GIA), is the method used to put into practice the strategy of gender mainstreaming defined by the UN Economic and Social Council in 1997: assessing the implications for women and men of any planned action — legislation, policies, or programmes — in all areas and at all levels, so that gender equality becomes an integral dimension of policy design rather than an afterthought. As a method it screens a proposed policy for gender relevance, gathers sex-disaggregated evidence, evaluates how the policy will affect women and men differently, and recommends adjustments, with monitoring built in.

Åbn i MethodMindSnartAnvend, sammenlign, få vejledning
Værktøjer og ressourcer
Hent slides
Lær og udforsk
VideoSnart

Læs hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Log ind med en gratis konto for at læse dette afsnit.

Log ind

Metodekort

Nabolaget af beslægtede metoder — vælg en knude for at udforske.

Kilder

  1. United Nations Economic and Social Council (1997). Mainstreaming the gender perspective into all policies and programmes in the United Nations system (Agreed Conclusions 1997/2). UN ECOSOC, New York. link
  2. European Institute for Gender Equality (2016). Gender Impact Assessment: Gender Mainstreaming Toolkit. EIGE, Vilnius. link

Sådan citerer du denne side

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Gender Mainstreaming Assessment and Gender Impact Assessment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/da/gender-studies/gender-mainstreaming-assessment

Hvilken metode?

Stil denne metode ved siden af dens nærmeste slægtninge, og læs dem side om side — biblioteket lægger bøgerne på bordet; valget er dit.

Sammenlign side om side

Refereret af

ScholarGateGender Mainstreaming Assessment (Gender Mainstreaming Assessment and Gender Impact Assessment). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/da/gender-studies/gender-mainstreaming-assessment · Datasæt: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026