Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Tidsopdelt kortlægningsgennemgang× | Scoping Review× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | Scientometri | Scientometri |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2005 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & Thomas | Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley |
| Type≠ | Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentation | Evidence synthesis review design |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842 | Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗ |
| Aliasser | temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping review | scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map |
| Relaterede | 6 | 6 |
| Resumé≠ | A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide. | A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|