ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Selvplagiat og tekstgenbrug×Ligheder kontra plagiat: Forståelse af forskellen×Verbatim Plagiarism×
FagområdeForskningsetikForskningsetikForskningsetik
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Oprindelsesår1990s2000s1950s
OphavspersonInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)Academic integrity frameworks and plagiarism detection software companiesAcademic integrity framework (modern definition)
TypeConceptConceptConcept
Oprindelig kildeRoig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗Hirsch, L. R. (2013). Recognizing plagiarism: A guide for academic professionals. Teaching Professor Blog. link ↗Council of Canadian Academies (2019). The state of science and technology in Canada. Ottawa: Council of Canadian Academies. link ↗
Aliassertext recycling, self-copying, duplicate publication, redundant publicationsimilarity index, turnitin score, similarity percentagedirect plagiarism, copy-and-paste plagiarism, literal copying
Relaterede244
ResuméSelf-plagiarism, or text recycling, occurs when an author reuses substantial portions of their own previously published work in a new publication without disclosure or acknowledgment. This includes republishing the same article in different venues, duplicating methods sections across multiple papers, or reusing discussion sections. While the intellectual property is the author's own, self-plagiarism is considered misconduct because it violates the principle that published work represents new research and it may inflate publication counts.A critical distinction exists between similarity percentages generated by plagiarism detection software (Turnitin, iThenticate) and an actual plagiarism verdict. A similarity index is a red flag requiring review; it is not a plagiarism determination. High similarity can result from legitimate quotations, references, shared technical language, or common knowledge. Conversely, low similarity does not guarantee absence of plagiarism. Human expert judgment is essential—similarity detection software provides data, not judgment.Verbatim plagiarism is the most straightforward and recognizable form of academic misconduct: copying text word-for-word from a source without quotation marks, citation, or attribution. It is the most easily detected form of plagiarism and carries severe institutional and career consequences.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Self-Plagiarism and Text Recycling · Similarity vs Plagiarism: Understanding the Distinction · Verbatim Plagiarism. Hentet 2026-06-20 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare