Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Selectorate Theory Analysis× | Polity Score Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde | International Relations | International Relations |
| Familie≠ | MCDM | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2003 | 2020 |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Alastair Smith, Randolph Siverson & James Morrow | Ted Robert Gurr, Monty Marshall & Keith Jaggers (Center for Systemic Peace) |
| Type≠ | Formal theory of leader survival and policy choice | Composite ordinal measure of regime authority characteristics |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2003). The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. link ↗ | Marshall, M. G., & Gurr, T. R. (2020). Polity5: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2018 (Dataset Users' Manual). Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace. link ↗ |
| Aliasser | Selectorate Theory, Logic of Political Survival, Winning Coalition Analysis, Selectorate Model of Governance | Polity IV Analysis, Polity5 Analysis, Polity2 Score, Polity Index of Democracy and Autocracy |
| Relaterede | 3 | 3 |
| Resumé≠ | Selectorate theory, developed by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, Alastair Smith, Randolph Siverson, and James Morrow in The Logic of Political Survival (2003), explains policy and foreign-policy behavior as a by-product of leaders' overriding goal: staying in power. Every leader depends on a winning coalition (W) drawn from a larger selectorate (S) of those with a say in choosing leaders. The relative size of W and S determines whether a leader buys loyalty with broad public goods or narrow private rewards — which in turn shapes growth, war, peace, and the survival of regimes. | Polity score analysis uses the Polity dataset to measure and compare the regime characteristics of states on a continuum from full autocracy to full democracy. Maintained by the Center for Systemic Peace (Marshall and Gurr), Polity codes institutional features — how chief executives are recruited, the constraints on their authority, and the openness of political competition — into separate democracy and autocracy indices that combine into a single polity score from −10 to +10. It is one of the most widely used measures of regime type in comparative politics and international relations. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|