Sammenlign metoder

	Scoping Review	Integrativ gennemgang
Fagområde	Scientometri	Scientometri
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Oprindelsesår	2005	2005 (updated methodology); roots in Cooper (1982)
Ophavsperson	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley	Robin Whittemore & Kathleen Knafl
Type	Evidence synthesis review design	Systematic review method
Oprindelig kilde	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.	Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553.
Aliasser	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map	integrative literature review, integrative research review, ILR, integrative synthesis
Relaterede	6	6
Resumé	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.	An integrative review is a systematic method for synthesising literature that allows the simultaneous inclusion of diverse study designs — experimental, quasi-experimental, and non-experimental — as well as theoretical papers. Unlike the conventional systematic review, which is restricted to controlled trials or a single methodology, the integrative review builds a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon by drawing on the full breadth of the relevant evidence base. The method follows a rigorous, structured pipeline to ensure transparency and minimise bias.