Sammenlign metoder
Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.
| Refleksiv tematisk analyse× | Diskurseranalyse× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fagområde≠ | Kvalitativ | Kvalitativ forskning |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Oprindelsesår≠ | 2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Ophavsperson≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Type≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| Oprindelig kilde≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Aliasser≠ | RTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Relaterede≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Resumé≠ | Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateDatasæt ↗ |
|
|