ScholarGate
Assistent

Sammenlign metoder

Gennemgå dine valgte metoder side om side; rækker, der afviger, er fremhævet.

Mendelsk randomisering×Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD)×
FagområdeKausal inferensKausal inferens
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Oprindelsesår19972008
OphavspersonGeorge Davey SmithImbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
TypeGenetic instrumental variable frameworkQuasi-experimental causal design
Oprindelig kildeDavey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014). Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(R1), R89-R98. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
AliasserMRRDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
Relaterede25
ResuméMendelian randomization is a method for estimating causal effects of exposures on outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables. Introduced by George Davey Smith in the 1990s, it exploits Mendel's law of segregation to remove confounding bias. It has become a cornerstone technique in epidemiological causal inference.Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGateDatasæt
  1. v1
  2. 3 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Kilder
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå til søgning Hent slides

ScholarGateSammenlign metoder: Mendelian Randomization · Regression Discontinuity. Hentet 2026-06-18 fra https://scholargate.app/da/compare