ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Analýza přežití s úpravou rizika×Párování na základě skóre propensity×
OborEpidemiologieStatistika ve výzkumu
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1972 (Cox regression); broader covariate-adjusted survival methods developed 1970s–1990s1983
TvůrceD. R. Cox (regression framework); extensions via Kaplan & Meier, Breslow, and othersPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypObservational and experimental analytical methodMethod
Původní zdrojCox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34(2), 187–220. link ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Další názvycovariate-adjusted survival analysis, adjusted time-to-event analysis, risk-stratified survival analysis, adjusted Kaplan-Meier / Cox analysisPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Příbuzné53
ShrnutíRisk-adjusted survival analysis estimates the time to an event of interest — such as death, relapse, or hospital readmission — while simultaneously accounting for baseline differences in patient characteristics (covariates). By incorporating confounders such as age, comorbidities, or disease severity, it produces hazard ratios, survival curves, and median survival estimates that are attributable to the factor of interest rather than to pre-existing risk differences between groups.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Risk-adjusted survival analysis · Propensity Score Matching. Získáno 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare