ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Studie rizikově upravené diagnostické přesnosti×Analýza ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic)×
OborEpidemiologieStatistika
RodinaProcess / pipelineHypothesis test
Rok vznikuConceptual roots 1980s–1990s; covariate-adjusted ROC formally introduced 20091954 (signal detection); 1982 (AUC formalization)
TvůrceMargaret Pepe and colleagues; covariate-adjusted ROC formalized by Janes & Pepe (2009)Peterson, Birdsall & Fox (signal detection theory); Hanley & McNeil (medical statistics)
TypObservational clinical study design with covariate adjustmentDiagnostic accuracy evaluation
Původní zdrojPepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198509844Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36. DOI ↗
Další názvycase-mix-adjusted diagnostic accuracy, stratified diagnostic accuracy study, covariate-adjusted diagnostic accuracy, risk-stratified DTA studyROC curve analysis, AUC analysis, sensitivity-specificity analysis, diagnostic accuracy analysis
Příbuzné64
ShrnutíA risk-adjusted diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test identifies a target condition while explicitly accounting for patient-level risk factors that influence either disease prevalence or test performance. By adjusting for case-mix, it yields accuracy estimates — sensitivity, specificity, and AUC — that are not confounded by the composition of the study sample, enabling fairer comparisons across populations and clinical settings.ROC analysis evaluates how well a continuous or ordinal test variable discriminates between two binary outcome classes. By plotting the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1 − specificity) across all decision thresholds, it produces a curve whose area under the curve (AUC) quantifies overall discriminative power, ranging from 0.5 (chance) to 1.0 (perfect discrimination).
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Risk-adjusted diagnostic accuracy study · ROC analysis. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare