ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Analýza kompetitivních rizik s úpravou na riziko×Párování na základě skóre propensity×
OborEpidemiologieStatistika ve výzkumu
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1999 (subdistribution hazard model); cause-specific hazard framework earlier1983
TvůrceJason Fine and Robert GrayPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypRegression model for time-to-event data with competing eventsMethod
Původní zdrojFine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Další názvycompeting risks regression, subdistribution hazard model, cause-specific hazard analysis, Fine-Gray modelPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Příbuzné43
ShrnutíRisk-adjusted competing risks analysis extends classical survival analysis to settings where subjects can experience more than one type of terminal event, and where the occurrence of one event prevents the occurrence of another. By modelling cause-specific or subdistribution hazards while adjusting for measured confounders, the method yields unbiased estimates of the absolute probability — the cumulative incidence function — of each event type over time in the presence of competing events.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Risk-adjusted competing risks analysis · Propensity Score Matching. Získáno 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare