ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Metoda syntetické kontroly pro hodnocení politik×Párování na základě skóre propensity×
OborKauzální inferenceStatistika ve výzkumu
RodinaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku2003-20101983
TvůrceAlberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal; extended by Abadie, Diamond & HainmuellerPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypCausal inference / comparative case studyMethod
Původní zdrojAbadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Další názvySynthetic Control Method, SCM, Synthetic Control, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller methodPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Příbuzné53
ShrnutíThe Synthetic Control Method (SCM) is a causal inference technique for evaluating the effect of a policy or intervention on a single treated unit — such as a region, country, or firm — by constructing a weighted combination of untreated comparison units that closely mirrors the treated unit before the intervention. Introduced by Abadie and Gardeazabal (2003) and formalized by Abadie, Diamond, and Hainmueller (2010), it provides a data-driven, transparent counterfactual for comparative case studies.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Policy Evaluation Synthetic Control Method · Propensity Score Matching. Získáno 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare