Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Mikroprůměrovaná F1 míra× | Vážený F1× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor | Hodnocení modelů | Hodnocení modelů |
| Rodina | MCDM | MCDM |
| Rok vzniku | 2000s | 2000s |
| Tvůrce | Multi-class evaluation community | Multi-class evaluation community |
| Typ | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Původní zdroj | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ |
| Další názvy≠ | Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1 | Support-weighted F1 |
| Příbuzné≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Shrnutí≠ | Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance. | Weighted F1 computes the F1-score for each class and then takes a weighted average, where weights are proportional to the number of samples in each class (support). It provides a middle ground between macro and micro-averaging. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|