ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Párová klinická studie fáze II×Párování na základě skóre propensity×
OborEpidemiologieStatistika ve výzkumu
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1960s–1980s (formalized with Simon optimal designs, 1989)1983
TvůrceGehan (1961) for Phase II designs; matching frameworks adapted from case-control methodologyPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypControlled clinical trial designMethod
Původní zdrojGehan, E. A. (1961). The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 13(4), 346–353. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Další názvymatched Phase II trial, historically matched Phase II study, propensity-matched Phase II trial, externally controlled Phase II trialPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Příbuzné53
ShrnutíA matched Phase II clinical trial is a single-arm or small-controlled early-efficacy study in which treated patients are paired with matched controls — drawn from historical databases, registries, or concurrent external cohorts — on key prognostic variables such as age, disease stage, and performance status. This design allows preliminary efficacy assessment without a concurrent randomized arm, trading randomization for feasibility while partially controlling for confounding through the matching process.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Matched Phase II clinical trial · Propensity Score Matching. Získáno 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare