ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Dynamické vyhodnocování dopadů kontrafaktuálních situací×Vážení na základě skóre sklonu (PSW / IPW)×
OborKauzální inferenceKauzální inference
RodinaRegression modelRegression model
Rok vzniku1986–20091983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
TvůrceRobins (1986); Lechner (2009) for sequential treatment settingsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypCausal inference / program evaluationCausal inference / reweighting
Původní zdrojRobins, J. M. (1986). A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period — application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Mathematical Modelling, 7(9-12), 1393-1512. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Další názvydynamic CIE, dynamic treatment evaluation, time-varying counterfactual analysis, longitudinal counterfactual evaluationPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Příbuzné66
ShrnutíDynamic Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (dynamic CIE) extends standard counterfactual program evaluation to settings where treatment is assigned sequentially across multiple periods. Rather than comparing a single treated versus untreated state, it estimates the causal effect of entire treatment trajectories or regimes, accounting for how intermediate outcomes and time-varying covariates feed back into subsequent treatment decisions.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Dynamic Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Propensity Score Weighting. Získáno 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare