Porovnat metody
Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.
| Teorie důkazů Dempstera-Shafera× | Teorie možnosti× | |
|---|---|---|
| Obor | Soft computing | Soft computing |
| Rodina | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 1976 | 1988 |
| Tvůrce≠ | Arthur P. Dempster & Glenn Shafer | Lotfi Zadeh; Didier Dubois & Henri Prade |
| Typ≠ | Uncertainty calculus for combining evidence | Uncertainty quantification framework |
| Původní zdroj≠ | Dempster, A. P. (1967). Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38(2), 325–339. DOI ↗ | Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1988). Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. Plenum Press. ISBN: 978-0-306-42520-2 |
| Další názvy | evidence theory, belief functions, evidential reasoning, Dempster-Shafer kanıt teorisi | Fuzzy Possibility Theory, Possibilistic Reasoning, Olasılık Teorisi (Bulanık), Possibility Distribution Theory |
| Příbuzné≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Shrnutí≠ | Dempster-Shafer theory is a mathematical framework for reasoning under uncertainty that generalizes Bayesian probability by representing ignorance explicitly. Instead of forcing a single probability on each hypothesis, it assigns belief mass to sets of hypotheses and derives a belief-plausibility interval, and it provides Dempster's rule for fusing evidence from multiple independent sources. Developed from Arthur Dempster's 1967 work and Glenn Shafer's 1976 monograph, it underpins evidential reasoning and sensor/decision fusion. | Possibility Theory is a mathematical framework for representing and reasoning under uncertainty, introduced by Lotfi Zadeh in 1978 and systematically developed by Didier Dubois and Henri Prade in their 1988 monograph. It uses possibility distributions — functions assigning a degree in [0,1] to each element of a universe — to encode what is plausible or consistent with available information, complementing probability theory for situations where data is scarce or knowledge is imprecise. |
| ScholarGateDatová sada ↗ |
|
|