ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnat metody

Prohlédněte si vybrané metody vedle sebe; řádky, které se liší, jsou zvýrazněny.

Angoff Standard Setting×Bookmark Standard Setting×Standardized Test Analysis×Srovnávání testů×
OborEducationEducationEducationPsychometrika
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineLatent structureLatent structure
Rok vzniku1971200120141984 (modern statistical treatment)
TvůrceWilliam H. AngoffHoward Mitzel, Daniel Lewis, Richard Patz & Donald Ross Green (CTB/McGraw-Hill)Educational measurement profession (AERA/APA/NCME Standards; Lord; Cronbach)Kolen & Brennan (foundational treatise, 2004/2014); Holland & Dorans (2006)
TypTest-centered standard-setting procedure for establishing cut scoresIRT-based standard-setting procedure using ordered item bookletsPsychometric evaluation of items, reliability, validity, and fairness of standardized testsScore transformation / latent-scale calibration
Původní zdrojCizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. AERA. ISBN: 9780935302356Kolen, M.J. & Brennan, R.L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4939-0316-6
Další názvyAngoff Method, Modified Angoff Method, Yes/No Angoff, Angoff Cut-Score ProcedureBookmark Method, Bookmark Procedure, Item Mapping Standard Setting, Ordered Item Booklet MethodStandardized Testing Analysis, Test Score Analysis, Item and Test Analysis, Educational Test PsychometricsTest Eşitleme (Test Equating), score equating, equipercentile equating, IRT true-score equating
Příbuzné3334
ShrnutíThe Angoff method is a test-centered procedure for establishing a passing score (cut score) on an examination. A panel of content experts conceptualizes a 'borderline' or minimally competent examinee and, for each item, estimates the probability that such an examinee would answer it correctly. Summing those probabilities yields a recommended cut score for each panelist, and averaging across panelists and discussion rounds produces the performance standard. It is among the most widely used standard-setting methods in licensure, certification, and K-12 testing.The Bookmark method is an item-response-theory-based standard-setting procedure in which test items are arranged in a booklet ordered from easiest to hardest. Panelists page through this ordered item booklet and place a 'bookmark' at the point separating items a borderline examinee would likely master from those they would not, judged against a fixed response probability (commonly two-thirds). The latent ability at the bookmark defines the cut score. Developed at CTB/McGraw-Hill, it became one of the dominant methods for large-scale K-12 assessments.Standardized test analysis is the body of psychometric methods used to evaluate and score standardized educational tests: analyzing how items perform, estimating reliability and the standard error of measurement, scaling scores via classical or item response theory, and assembling validity and fairness evidence. Governed by the professional Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and rooted in test theory synthesized by Lord and others, it is the disciplined work that turns a set of test questions into defensible scores carrying meaning, precision, and fairness.Test equating is a family of statistical methods that converts scores earned on one test form onto the score scale of another form, so that scores from different administrations or versions can be compared and reported on a common metric. The foundational modern treatment is Kolen and Brennan (2004/2014); Holland and Dorans (2006) provide the authoritative chapter-length overview within the field of educational measurement.
ScholarGateDatová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Přejít na hledání Stáhnout prezentaci

ScholarGatePorovnat metody: Angoff Standard Setting · Bookmark Standard Setting · Standardized Test Analysis · Test Equating. Získáno 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/cs/compare