Web Controversy Analysis
Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.
Llegeix el mètode complet
Inicia la sessió amb un compte gratuït per llegir aquesta secció.
Mapa de mètodes
El veïnat de mètodes relacionats — seleccioneu un node per explorar-lo.
Fonts
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
- Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655-686. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915574602 ↗
Com citar aquesta pàgina
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Web-Based Controversy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ca/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis
Quin mètode?
Poseu aquest mètode al costat dels seus parents més pròxims i llegiu-los de costat a costat — la biblioteca disposa els llibres sobre la taula; la tria és vostra.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ compara
- Controversy MappingScience Technology Studies↔ compara
- Digital MethodsScience Technology Studies↔ compara
- Issue MappingScience Technology Studies↔ compara
Citat per
Mètodes similars
Has vist cap problema en aquesta pàgina? Informa'n o suggereix una correcció →