Most Different Systems Design
The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.
Llegeix el mètode complet
Inicia la sessió amb un compte gratuït per llegir aquesta secció.
Mapa de mètodes
El veïnat de mètodes relacionats — seleccioneu un node per explorar-lo.
Fonts
- Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422
- Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907313077 ↗
- Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521676564
Com citar aquesta pàgina
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Most Different Systems Design (Comparative Method of Agreement). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ca/political-science/most-different-systems-design
Quin mètode?
Poseu aquest mètode al costat dels seus parents més pròxims i llegiu-los de costat a costat — la biblioteca disposa els llibres sobre la taula; la tria és vostra.
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ compara
- Rastreig de processosPsicometria↔ compara
- Qualitative Comparative AnalysisPolitical Science↔ compara
Citat per
Mètodes similars
Conceptes de referència relacionats
Has vist cap problema en aquesta pàgina? Informa'n o suggereix una correcció →