Cranfield Evaluation Paradigm
The Cranfield evaluation paradigm is the foundational experimental design for measuring how well an information retrieval system finds relevant documents. Devised by Cyril Cleverdon at the College of Aeronautics in Cranfield during the 1960s, it fixes three ingredients — a document collection, a set of search requests, and human relevance judgments linking requests to documents — and then holds them constant so that competing indexing methods or retrieval algorithms can be compared on recall and precision under controlled, repeatable conditions. By abstracting evaluation away from any single live user and turning it into a reusable laboratory experiment, Cranfield made retrieval effectiveness a measurable quantity and supplied the template that every later large-scale campaign, including TREC, has built upon.
Llegeix el mètode complet
Inicia la sessió amb un compte gratuït per llegir aquesta secció.
Mapa de mètodes
El veïnat de mètodes relacionats — seleccioneu un node per explorar-lo.
Fonts
- Cleverdon, C. W. (1967). The Cranfield tests on index language devices. Aslib Proceedings, 19(6), 173-194. DOI: 10.1108/eb050097 ↗
- Voorhees, E. M., & Harman, D. K. (Eds.). (2005). TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262220736
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
Com citar aquesta pàgina
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Cranfield Evaluation Paradigm (Test-Collection Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ca/library-information-science/cranfield-evaluation-paradigm
Quin mètode?
Poseu aquest mètode al costat dels seus parents més pròxims i llegiu-los de costat a costat — la biblioteca disposa els llibres sobre la taula; la tria és vostra.
- Query Expansion EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ compara
- Relevance Feedback EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ compara
- TREC Pooling and Relevance JudgmentsLibrary Information Science↔ compara
Citat per
Mètodes similars
Has vist cap problema en aquesta pàgina? Informa'n o suggereix una correcció →