ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineprofessional-judgment-methodology

Marc de SPJ: Judici Professional Estructurat per

SPJ is a compromise between purely actuarial prediction and unstructured clinical judgment. It acknowledges that risk factors are dynamic, context-dependent, and individualized. SPJ operationalizes clinical judgment by guiding clinicians to identify salient risk factors, synthesize evidence for each factor, integrate the pattern of factors (not just sum them), and create a coherent case narrative that justifies the risk conclusion. This method allows for clinical flexibility to handle individual complexity while promoting discipline and transparency to reduce bias.

Obre a MethodMindAviatVídeoAviatBaixa les diapositives

Llegeix el mètode complet

Només per a membres

Inicia la sessió amb un compte gratuït per llegir aquesta secció.

Inicia la sessió

Mapa de mètodes

El veïnat de mètodes relacionats — seleccioneu un node per explorar-lo.

Fonts

  1. Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press. link
  2. Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Belfrage, H. (2008). Structured professional judgment as an approach to violence risk assessment. In K. A. Van den Berg, P. T. Mason, & B. K. Waller (Eds.), Risk assessment and management of violent offenders (pp. 85–109). Springer. link

Com citar aquesta pàgina

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Structured Professional Judgment Framework for Risk Assessment. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ca/forensic-psychology/structured-professional-judgment

Quin mètode?

Poseu aquest mètode al costat dels seus parents més pròxims i llegiu-los de costat a costat — la biblioteca disposa els llibres sobre la taula; la tria és vostra.

Compara de costat a costat

Citat per

ScholarGateSPJ Framework (Structured Professional Judgment Framework for Risk Assessment). Recuperat el 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/ca/forensic-psychology/structured-professional-judgment · Conjunt de dades: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026