Compara mètodes
Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.
| Anàlisi de co-paraules assistida per VOSviewer× | Mapeig de la ciència× | |
|---|---|---|
| Camp≠ | Cienciometria | Bibliometria |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Any d'origen≠ | Co-word analysis: 1983; VOSviewer software: 2010 | 2000s |
| Autor original≠ | Co-word analysis: Callon et al. (1983); VOSviewer tool: van Eck & Waltman (2010) | Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others |
| Tipus≠ | Bibliometric network analysis technique | Method |
| Font seminal≠ | van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. DOI ↗ | Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗ |
| Àlies≠ | keyword co-occurrence analysis via VOSviewer, VOSviewer co-word mapping, keyword network mapping, co-keyword analysis | knowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization |
| Relacionats≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Resum≠ | VOSviewer-assisted co-word analysis is a scientometric pipeline that constructs and visualizes keyword co-occurrence networks from a bibliographic corpus using VOSviewer software. By mapping how often pairs of author-assigned or index keywords appear together in the same publications, the method reveals the intellectual structure of a research field — its dominant themes, emerging topics, and conceptual clusters — producing interactive density and network maps that support systematic interpretation. | Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning. |
| ScholarGateConjunt de dades ↗ |
|
|