ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

UTA*×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
CampPresa de decisionsPresa de decisions
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Any d'origen19851995
Autor originalSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipusAdditive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgementsStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Font seminalSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Àlies
Relacionats88
ResumUTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: UTASTAR · CRITIC. Recuperat el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare