Compara mètodes

	Revisió sistemàtica de la literatura amb divisions temporals	Anàlisi d'evolució temàtica
Camp	Cienciometria	Cienciometria
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Any d'origen	2010s	2011
Autor original	Adapted from systematic review methodology; temporal segmentation formalized in bibliometric practice (Zupic & Cater, 2015; Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017)	Manuel J. Cobo and colleagues (University of Granada)
Tipus	Systematic review variant with temporal segmentation	Quantitative bibliometric technique
Font seminal	Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.	Cobo, M. J., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.
Àlies	temporal systematic review, period-based systematic review, chronological systematic review, time-segmented literature review	TEA, thematic development analysis, temporal thematic mapping, longitudinal theme analysis
Relacionats	5	6
Resum	A time-sliced systematic literature review applies the rigorous search, screening, and synthesis protocol of a standard systematic review while dividing the retrieved corpus into discrete temporal periods — time slices — and analyzing each period separately. This design reveals how a research field has developed across time: which topics emerged, grew, or declined; how key authors and journals shifted; and how intellectual structures evolved from one era to the next.	Thematic evolution analysis is a bibliometric technique that divides a body of literature into consecutive time periods and tracks how research themes emerge, consolidate, split, merge, or disappear across those periods. By combining co-word analysis, clustering, and strategic diagrams for each time slice, it produces a dynamic picture of a field's intellectual development rather than a static snapshot.