ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Revisió sistemàtica de la literatura amb divisions temporals×Revisió sistemàtica de la literatura×
CampCienciometriaCienciometria
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen2010s1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
Autor originalAdapted from systematic review methodology; temporal segmentation formalized in bibliometric practice (Zupic & Cater, 2015; Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017)Archie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
TipusSystematic review variant with temporal segmentationEvidence synthesis methodology
Font seminalZupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. DOI ↗Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
Àliestemporal systematic review, period-based systematic review, chronological systematic review, time-segmented literature reviewSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
Relacionats55
ResumA time-sliced systematic literature review applies the rigorous search, screening, and synthesis protocol of a standard systematic review while dividing the retrieved corpus into discrete temporal periods — time slices — and analyzing each period separately. This design reveals how a research field has developed across time: which topics emerged, grew, or declined; how key authors and journals shifted; and how intellectual structures evolved from one era to the next.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Time-sliced Systematic literature review · Systematic Literature Review. Recuperat el 2026-06-20 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare