Compara mètodes

	SWARA II	CRITIC-M
Camp	Presa de decisions	Presa de decisions
Família	MCDM	MCDM
Any d'origen	2010	1995
Autor original	Keršuliene, Zavadskas, and Turskis; extended by Zolfani et al.	Based on Diakoulaki et al.'s CRITIC; modified variants developed later
Tipus	Expert-based stepwise weight derivation with ratio refinement	Objective weight derivation via correlation and variance
Font seminal	Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by evaluating opposing parties' interest in civil litigation. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(3), 412-422.	Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.
Àlies	SWARA II, SWARA 2	CRITIC-M, Modified CRITIC
Relacionats	4	3
Resum	SWARA II (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis - Improved) is an enhanced variant of the SWARA method for deriving criterion weights from expert assessments. Instead of requiring pairwise comparisons or absolute weight assignments, SWARA II asks experts to rank criteria, then assess the relative importance of each criterion compared to the next-ranked one. Improved variants enhance robustness and interpretability of weight derivation.	CRITIC-M (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified) is an objective weight derivation method that extends the classical CRITIC approach. It assigns weights to criteria based on two intrinsic properties of the decision matrix: variance (how much a criterion differentiates alternatives) and correlation (how much a criterion conflicts with or supplements others). Modified variants adjust the formulation to improve robustness or interpretability.