Compara mètodes
Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.
| Social Construction of Technology× | Social Shaping of Technology× | |
|---|---|---|
| Camp | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Any d'origen≠ | 1984 | 1985 |
| Autor original≠ | Trevor Pinch & Wiebe Bijker | Donald MacKenzie, Judy Wajcman, Robin Williams, David Edge |
| Tipus≠ | Constructivist theory of technological development | Analytic tradition and method in the sociology of technology |
| Font seminal≠ | Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗ | MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.). Open University Press. ISBN: 9780335199136 |
| Àlies | SCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysis | SST analysis, Social shaping approach, Shaping of technology framework |
| Relacionats | 4 | 4 |
| Resum≠ | The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one. | The Social Shaping of Technology (SST) is the umbrella tradition in the sociology of technology that rejects technological determinism and argues that the content and trajectory of technical artefacts are themselves outcomes of social, economic, organisational, and political choices. Rather than treating technology as an autonomous force whose effects society must merely absorb, SST analysis opens the 'black box' of design and shows that at every stage—conception, development, standardisation, and use—things could have been, and were, decided otherwise. |
| ScholarGateConjunt de dades ↗ |
|
|