Compara mètodes
Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.
| Estudi pragmàtic de precisió diagnòstica× | Avaluació de proves de cribratge× | |
|---|---|---|
| Camp | Epidemiologia | Epidemiologia |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Any d'origen≠ | 2000s–2010s (formalized alongside STARD reporting guidelines) | 1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s |
| Autor original≠ | Evolved from STARD initiative (Bossuyt et al.) and pragmatic trial framework (Schwartz & Lellouch, 1967) | Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation |
| Tipus≠ | Observational diagnostic study design | Observational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design |
| Font seminal≠ | Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2015). STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗ | Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗ |
| Àlies | real-world diagnostic accuracy study, pragmatic DAS, routine-care diagnostic study, pragmatic test evaluation | screening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE |
| Relacionats | 6 | 6 |
| Resum≠ | A pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a diagnostic test performs under real-world clinical conditions — not in idealized, tightly controlled settings. Conducted within routine care workflows, it measures sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios for an index test against a reference standard, yielding accuracy estimates directly applicable to clinical practice rather than laboratory benchmarks. | Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance. |
| ScholarGateConjunt de dades ↗ |
|
|