ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Policy Network Analysis×Advocacy Coalition Framework×
CampPublic PolicyPublic Policy
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen19921993
Autor originalR. A. W. Rhodes & David Marsh (British school); broader governance-network traditionPaul Sabatier & Hank Jenkins-Smith
TipusAnalysis of inter-organisational policy relationshipsTheory of the policy process
Font seminalMarsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.) (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN: 9780198278528Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 9780813316499
ÀliesPolicy Networks, Governance Network Analysis, Policy Network ApproachACF, Sabatier-Jenkins-Smith Framework, Advocacy Coalition Approach
Relacionats44
ResumPolicy network analysis examines policymaking as the product of relationships among interdependent actors — government agencies, interest groups, experts and others — who exchange resources such as information, money, legitimacy and authority. In the influential British tradition associated with R. A. W. Rhodes and David Marsh, policy networks range along a continuum from tightly knit, exclusive 'policy communities' to loose, open 'issue networks', and the type of network is held to shape policy outcomes. More broadly, the approach applies the concepts and tools of social-network analysis to governance, treating the structure of ties among actors as a key explanatory variable.The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theory of the policy process developed by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith from the late 1980s and consolidated in their 1993 volume Policy Change and Learning. It explains policy stability and change over long periods by analysing competing coalitions of actors within a policy subsystem who are bound together by shared beliefs. Policy change is understood as a function of the interaction among these belief-based coalitions, the policy-oriented learning that occurs over time, and external events and shocks that can shift the balance of power among them.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Policy Network Analysis · Advocacy Coalition Framework. Recuperat el 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare