ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Placemaking Evaluation×Visual Preference Survey×
CampUrban StudiesUrban Studies
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen20001994
Autor originalProject for Public Spaces (drawing on William H. Whyte and Jan Gehl)Anton C. Nelessen
TipusStructured before/after evaluation of public-space quality and useSurvey eliciting community design preferences by rating images
Font seminalCarmona, M. (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. URBAN DESIGN International, 24, 47–59. DOI ↗Nelessen, A. C. (1994). Visions for a New American Dream: Process, Principles, and an Ordinance to Plan and Design Small Communities. American Planning Association. ISBN: 9780918286888
ÀliesPlace Diagram Evaluation, Power of 10 Assessment, Public-Space Quality Audit, Before-and-After Placemaking StudyVPS, Visual Preference Analysis, Image Preference Survey, Nelessen Visual Preference Survey
Relacionats44
ResumPlacemaking evaluation is the structured assessment of whether a public-space intervention — a redesigned plaza, a reclaimed street, a new pocket park — actually makes the place more sociable, comfortable, and well used. Drawing on the observational tradition of William H. Whyte and Jan Gehl and codified by the Project for Public Spaces, it combines qualitative place-quality judgements with countable measures of activity, often comparing the same site before and after the change. The result is evidence that a place works for people rather than a designer's assertion that it should.A visual preference survey (VPS) elicits a community's design preferences by asking residents to rate a curated set of photographs — of streets, buildings, public spaces, and landscapes — on a simple numeric scale. Developed and popularized by planner Anton Nelessen, it turns the often vague question of what a community wants its environment to look like into comparable scores, revealing which images people reward, which they reject, and where they agree or disagree. The averaged ratings give planners a defensible visual brief grounded in resident preference rather than professional taste.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Placemaking Evaluation · Visual Preference Survey. Recuperat el 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare