ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Anàlisi Fenomenològica Interpretativa Participativa×Anàlisi Temàtica Reflexiva×
CampQualitativaQualitativa
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen2000s–2010s2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
Autor originalJonathan A. Smith (IPA foundation); adapted by participatory researchers in disability, health, and education studiesVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TipusQualitative research designQualitative research method
Font seminalSmith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
ÀliesParticipatory IPA, P-IPA, participatory phenomenological inquiry, collaborative IPARTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Relacionats56
ResumParticipatory Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Participatory IPA) merges the interpretive, meaning-focused rigour of IPA with participatory research principles, engaging participants as active co-researchers in the design, data collection, and analytic phases. The approach is especially valued in studies involving marginalised or vulnerable groups — such as people with cognitive impairments, chronic illness, or lived experience of social exclusion — where standard interview protocols may silence rather than amplify participant voice.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Participatory Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Recuperat el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare