ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Observació Participant×Criteris de Fiabilitat en la Recerca Qualitativa×
CampRecerca qualitativaRecerca qualitativa
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen19221985
Autor originalBronislaw MalinowskiYvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
TipusMethodFramework
Font seminalGeertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0465026432Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
Àliesethnographic observation, participatory observation, overt observation, immersive observationtrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability
Relacionats44
ResumParticipant observation is a qualitative research method in which the researcher embeds themselves within a community, organization, or social setting for an extended period, engaging in the activities and relationships of the group while systematically observing and documenting behavior, interactions, and cultural meaning. Pioneered by Malinowski in the 1920s and developed in anthropology, the method has been adopted across sociology, education, health sciences, and organizational research. The researcher functions as both insider (participating in group activities) and outsider (maintaining analytical distance), generating thick description—rich accounts of context, behavior, and meaning that reveal how people actually live and interact.Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 4 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Participant Observation · Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research. Recuperat el 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare