ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Avaluació ordinal de la validesa de contingut×Desenvolupament d'escales×
CampPsicometriaPsicometria
FamíliaLatent structureLatent structure
Any d'origen20031991–1995
Autor originalWynd, Schmidt & SchaeferMultiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson
TipusScale validation / content validityMulti-step methodological framework
Font seminalWynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569
Àliesordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validityquestionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building
Relacionats45
ResumOrdinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain.Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Ordinal Content Validity · Scale development. Recuperat el 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare