Compara mètodes

	Validesa de Contingut Multinivell	Validesa de constructe
Camp	Psicometria	Psicometria
Família	Latent structure	Latent structure
Any d'origen	1975–2000s	1955
Autor original	Rooted in Lawshe (1975) for content validity; multilevel extension developed through multilevel psychometric literature from the 1990s onward	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
Tipus	Validity evaluation / expert judgment	Validity evaluation framework
Font seminal	Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385.	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Àlies	hierarchical content validity, nested-data content validity, multilevel scale content evaluation, MCV	construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Relacionats	6	6
Resum	Multilevel content validity extends the classical content validity framework to settings where items, raters, or respondents are nested within hierarchical structures — such as students within schools, patients within clinics, or items rated by panels from distinct cultural or professional groups. It ensures that scale content is relevant and representative at every level of the hierarchy, not just in the aggregate.	Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.