Compara mètodes
Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.
| Escala d'Adopció de la Innovació× | Escala d'Actituds envers la Pràctica Basada en l'Evidència (EBPAS-36)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Camp | Ciència de la implementació | Ciència de la implementació |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Any d'origen≠ | 1983 | 2005 |
| Autor original≠ | Everett M. Rogers, PhD; Tornatzky & Klein framework; multiple measurement approaches | Gregory A. Aarons, PhD |
| Tipus≠ | Self-report questionnaire or behavioral tracking | Self-report questionnaire |
| Font seminal≠ | Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press. link ↗ | Aarons, G. A. (2011). Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale-50 (EBPAS-50) and EBPAS-36 short form: Psychometric properties. Implementation Science, 6(1), 89. link ↗ |
| Àlies | Adoption Scale, Innovation Adoption, Adoption Readiness | EBPAS, EBPAS-36, Evidence-Based Practice Attitude |
| Relacionats | 5 | 5 |
| Resum≠ | Innovation Adoption refers to the extent to which an innovation, evidence-based practice, or new technology is actually used by the target population or in the target setting. Adoption is typically measured as the percentage of eligible users/staff who have adopted the innovation by a specific time point, or the trajectory of adoption over time (adoption curve). Grounded in Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations theory, adoption is a key implementation outcome distinct from readiness (willingness to adopt), fidelity (quality of delivery), or effectiveness (impact on outcomes). An innovation can be widely adopted but delivered with low fidelity, or adopted by only a subset of users despite being efficacious. Adoption curves reflect organizational readiness, innovation-context fit, and implementation strategy effectiveness. Adoption is often the first implementation outcome to emerge, typically preceding fidelity and effectiveness improvements. | The EBPAS-36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that assesses clinicians' and organizational leaders' attitudes toward adopting and implementing evidence-based practices (EBP). Developed by Aarons in 2005 and refined through multiple validation studies, it measures four core dimensions: perceived requirements to adopt EBP, the appeal and usefulness of EBP to individual practice, organizational openness to innovation, and perceived divergence between current practice and EBP requirements. The EBPAS is widely used in healthcare, mental health, child welfare, and substance abuse treatment settings to predict adoption readiness and guide implementation planning. |
| ScholarGateConjunt de dades ↗ |
|
|