ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Revisió exploratòria de mapeig de camp×Anàlisi Bibliomètrica×
CampCienciometriaCienciometria
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen2005 (foundational framework); field-mapping purpose formalised c. 2015–20181969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Autor originalArksey & O'Malley (scoping review framework); field-mapping purpose formalised by Munn et al. and Peters et al.Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
TipusEvidence synthesis — systematic review variantQuantitative literature analysis
Font seminalMunn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic review and scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
Àliesfield-mapping scoping study, evidence-mapping scoping review, field map review, scoping review for field mappingbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Relacionats66
ResumA field-mapping scoping review is a purposive variant of the scoping review in which the overarching goal is to chart the conceptual and empirical landscape of a research field — identifying what has been studied, by whom, using which methods, and where knowledge gaps remain. It follows the Arksey and O'Malley scoping framework but is explicitly oriented toward producing a structured map of a field rather than answering a focused clinical or policy question.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Field-mapping Scoping review · Bibliometric Analysis. Recuperat el 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare