Compara mètodes

	Crítica textual digital	Crítica textual
Camp	Mètodes de camp	Mètodes de camp
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Any d'origen	1990s–2000s (mature field by early 2000s)	Antiquity; modern systematic method c. 1850s (Lachmann)
Autor original	Patrick Sahle, Peter Robinson, and the digital humanities community (building on traditional textual criticism)	Classical philologists (Karl Lachmann foremost in systematic method)
Tipus	Qualitative-computational philological method	Humanistic / philological research method
Font seminal	Sahle, P. (2013). Digitale Editionsformen. Zum Umgang mit der Überlieferung unter den Bedingungen des Medienwandels. 3 vols. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.	West, M. L. (1973). Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts. Teubner. ISBN: 978-3519074014
Àlies	digital philology, computational textual criticism, digital scholarly editing, digital critical editing	lower criticism, editorial criticism, philological criticism, manuscript criticism
Relacionats	4	5
Resum	Digital textual criticism is the application of computational and digital methods to the scholarly analysis, collation, and editing of historical texts. Building on centuries-old philological practice, it uses tools such as XML/TEI encoding, automated collation software (e.g., CollateX), and computational stemmatology to compare manuscript witnesses, reconstruct textual transmission histories, and produce digital critical editions that are richer and more transparent than their print counterparts.	Textual criticism is a systematic philological method for identifying, comparing, and evaluating variant readings across multiple manuscript or print witnesses of a text in order to reconstruct the most accurate version of the original — or the author's intended — text. Applied since antiquity to classical, biblical, and literary works, it remains the foundational editorial method in classical studies, biblical scholarship, medieval studies, and critical editing of literary works.