ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Validesa de contingut×Desenvolupament d'escales×
CampPsicometriaPsicometria
FamíliaLatent structureLatent structure
Any d'origen19751991–1995
Autor originalC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementMultiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson
TipusValidity evidence / expert judgement procedureMulti-step methodological framework
Font seminalLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569
Àliescontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationquestionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building
Relacionats65
ResumContent validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Download slides

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Content Validity · Scale development. Recuperat el 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare