ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Validesa de contingut×Validesa discriminant×
CampPsicometriaPsicometria
FamíliaLatent structureLatent structure
Any d'origen19751959
Autor originalC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
TipusValidity evidence / expert judgement procedureValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Font seminalLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Àliescontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Relacionats65
ResumContent validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Content Validity · Discriminant Validity. Recuperat el 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare