Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Validesa de constructe×Validesa discriminant×
CampPsicometriaPsicometria
FamíliaLatent structureLatent structure
Any d'origen19551959
Autor originalLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. MeehlDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
TipusValidity evaluation frameworkValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Font seminalCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Àliesconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Relacionats65
ResumConstruct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Download slides

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Construct Validity · Discriminant Validity. Recuperat el 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare