ScholarGate
Assistent

Compara mètodes

Revisa els mètodes seleccionats l'un al costat de l'altre; les files que difereixen es ressalten.

Investigació de proves de models comparatius×Investigació per contrast d'hipòtesis×
CampDisseny de recercaDisseny de recerca
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Any d'origen1969–2000sEarly 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933)
Autor originalRooted in structural equation modeling traditions; formalized through Jöreskog (1969) and extended by Vandenberg & Lance (2000)Karl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson
TipusQuantitative confirmatory-comparative research designQuantitative confirmatory research design
Font seminalKline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603
Àliescomparative model comparison, cross-group model testing, competing model comparison research, comparative structural model evaluationhypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST design
Relacionats44
ResumComparative model testing research is a quantitative design in which two or more theoretically motivated models — or the same model evaluated across distinct groups or conditions — are systematically tested and compared using fit indices, likelihood-ratio tests, or information criteria. The goal is to determine which model better represents the data structure, or whether a model's parameter structure holds equally across comparison groups.Hypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences.
ScholarGateConjunt de dades
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonts
  3. PUBLISHED

Ves a la cerca Baixa les diapositives

ScholarGateCompara mètodes: Comparative Model Testing Research · Hypothesis Testing Research. Recuperat el 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/ca/compare